The demise of the nation-state

A lesson from Afghanistan

Image: Mother and Child, Intuit Sculpture, photo by author

This is not the first time nor the last this script has been written: the formation, and the grip, of the nation-state on human progress has serious consequences — refugees, state-authorized violence and oppression, militarism, a dysfunctional international peace-keeping assembly, to name a few.

In place of the juggernaut of aristocracy and norms, the “recent” ascent of the nation-state is cresting. One can plausibly argue that the notion of the nation-state as organizing human energies is being tested across fault lines to progress.

The world can be divided into two camps: one that perpetuates the myth of the nation-state and one that aspires to form its successor.

This past week the lesson from Afghanistan is that one “consequence” of the nation-state is militarism, the very social oppression the nation-state founders sought to dismantle. Of course the self-serving victors in Afghanistan, the Taliban, now replete with weaponry, are promising across social media a peaceful transition of power. Who doesn’t want to appear as the ‘good guys?’ Taken for granted is the image of a Taliban victor cradling an AK-47.

In the militaristic world deals are made among arms carriers, not plebiscites; among economic interests and elites, not among inhabitants. And sacrifices are made by patriots, essential workers, human peace-keepers. The militaristic world is a whirligig of influence, ill-gained trust, and domestic terror.

“Don’t make me and my family hostages in your geo-political power fight.”

-“Occupied West Bank” Settler

In the militaristic world there is constant watching the ‘other:’ the watcher and the watched. To borrow a medieval analogy, our present day surveillance habits are like the ramparts of ‘yore: once scaled, defeat is almost certain.

“Science” tells us otherwise: COVID-19 doesn’t know borders. COVID-19 doesn’t stick in one place. COVID-19 knows no ramparts. Neither does ‘climate change.’ One can argue that the next fight will not be geo-political (Naomi Klein, ‘This Changes Everything’).

Who’s oppressing?

The forces of exclusion, of zero-sum, newly wealthy oppressors, mostly but not exclusively white males, survivors of global adventures, emboldened to sally forth like the crew depicted in a painting exalting Columbus’ planting a flag in the “New World.”

The ‘fall of Afghanistan’ is a failure of the West. It marks the transfer of global influence to the East, specifically China. Afghanistan is saying, as the West Bank settler did, ‘take your geo-political dog fights elsewhere. You and your kind are not welcome here.’

Could Western “prerogatives” have coexisted with Eastern counter-aggression? Militarism is short-sighted. The next “war” is not about ground-taking and what lies underneath, but is about air-breathing and water-drinking.

And in this next one, we are all hostages.

August 21




Refuses to nap. Septuagenarian. Cliche’ raker. Writes weekly.

Recommended from Medium


Text of President El Sisi’s speech at the opening of the Aswan Forum for Peace and Sustainable…

CAA and unrest in India: What we must learn from the government’s divisive policies.

The most stunning election night in New Zealand history!

The Brexit Election?

Discriminating against Scientology in Germany is illegal, Federal Court said

Delhi teen and friends start venture to help acid attack survivors

Notebooks under the rice bags

Get the Medium app

A button that says 'Download on the App Store', and if clicked it will lead you to the iOS App store
A button that says 'Get it on, Google Play', and if clicked it will lead you to the Google Play store
Rodney Clough

Rodney Clough

Refuses to nap. Septuagenarian. Cliche’ raker. Writes weekly.

More from Medium

Build Back Better: Next Steps

A Harangue on All But Threats

Company America’s parallel justice system is a recipe for unfairness

Up Come the Prols